Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(383)
-
▼
June
(56)
- "Son of God" & other terms
- Dr. Nassif interviews sister Nonna Harrison
- Generation Orthodox Podcast
- Wounded by Love "The Life and the Wisdom of Elder ...
- Wisdom of the Saints "Elder Ephiphanios"
- Second sunday after Pentecost Sunday
- Answering King Neb "A full preterist" Round 2
- Introduction to the Bible - Lesson 4: The Oral Tra...
- Answering a question about the Episcopal church
- Orthodox Theological Society Interview with Matthe...
- Answering King Neb "A full preterist"
- Fasting
- Answering a question about The Deaconess
- Missions and Evangelism
- introduction to the Bible - Lesson 3:
- The Sunday Of All The Saints
- The Holy Spirit
- The Judaizers
- Sho Baraka's 1st solo music video "higher love"
- Justus, the third bishop of Jerusalem
- The Heresy of the Ebionites
- Jordan archaeologists unearth an ancient church
- When did the Jews(nonbelieving) "officially" rejec...
- The Letter of Aristeas and it's ussage of the word...
- Rob talks about Peter Enn's book and the Reformed ...
- Introduction to the Bible - Lesson 2: Inspiration...
- Saturday of Souls & Pentecost Sunday
- Death to the World
- answering a question about various groups
- Answering a Question about the Atonement in Orthodoxy
- The Evangelical Orthodox Church
- Wisdom teeth pulled
- Christian rap 101 (westcoast street)
- Rome, Constantinople and Canterbury part 3
- Rome, Constantinople and Canterbury part 2
- Introduction to the Bible - Lesson 1: Overview
- THE EMPIRE STRIKES BARACK
- N.T. Wright's new book & his thoughts about the En...
- "Rome, Constantinople and Canterbury. Mother Churc...
- Classical Arminianism: JOHN 6: JESUS SAYS HE HAS G...
- The American view
- OSB press
- The Early Christians and Patristic Citations
- A review and critique of the conference held last ...
- Ancient Christian commentary on scripture
- The Grace of Baptism & Later Personal Awareness
- The Puritans & their Descendants
- Discipline in your spiritual life
- The Emergent movement
- African American & Ancient Christian conference
- Again at 30
- Christ is Risen - Part 7
- A theology of rap
- IS YHWH God the Father or the Trinity
- What I'm reading in June 08
- Loving one's wife
-
▼
June
(56)
Saint Moses the Black
Ecumenical Councils
Popular Posts
-
He begins with what happened in Alaska in 1795. http://audio.ancientfaith.com/specials/svs/eduday_frchad.mp3 JNORM888
-
By Alexander F. C. Webster, & Darrell Cole As seen from the website : This gives the opposite view of the other book "The Pacifist ...
-
Orthodox.tv has alot of videos about various Saints on their website. You can buy them at their Store , or you can view them online by subs...
-
This is lesson 18 of the introduction to the Bible series by Dr. Jeannie Constantinou, from her podcast " Search the Scriptures "....
-
"Aquila, a Jewish proselyte who lived in the early second century, made a Greek translation of the Old Testament. Thereafter, the Jews ...
-
Part 1: Part 2: Part 3: JNORM888
Labels
- about me (54)
- African American (33)
- Albert (5)
- ancestral sin (5)
- Ancient Christianity Conference (31)
- ancient heresies (23)
- ancientfaithradio (124)
- Archeology (11)
- Arminianism (32)
- Atheism (26)
- Atonement (18)
- Audio Sermons (10)
- Augustinianism (14)
- Baptism (11)
- Bible study (12)
- Book reviews (7)
- books (69)
- brotherhood of saint moses (25)
- calamity (2)
- Calvinism (69)
- charity (3)
- Christmass (10)
- Christology (1)
- Church Calendar (5)
- church fathers (60)
- church history (120)
- Confession (1)
- conspiracy theories (4)
- conversion stories (42)
- creationism (13)
- David (7)
- debates (14)
- determinism (1)
- Divine Energies/grace (15)
- Divine Energiesgrace (1)
- Divine Liturgy (5)
- Dr. Jeannie Constantinou (43)
- Eastern Orthodoxy (254)
- ecclesiology (3)
- Economics (2)
- Ecumenical councils (8)
- election (6)
- eschatology (22)
- Eucharist (7)
- Eugenics (7)
- Evangelism (1)
- fasting (8)
- free will (27)
- Ft. Thomas Hopko (43)
- fullpreterism (5)
- hiphop music (31)
- Icons (15)
- Incarnation (1)
- interest (3)
- Isa Almisry (1)
- Jesus (18)
- Kabane52 (1)
- Kallistos Ware (8)
- Learning Greek (5)
- Lectures (2)
- Lutheranism (1)
- Maximus Scott (2)
- Monasticism (15)
- Neopaganism (1)
- News (6)
- Oriental Orthodox (16)
- Orthodox Apologetics (22)
- Orthodox education (12)
- Orthodox Podcasts (30)
- Orthodox videos (67)
- Orthros/Matins (1)
- Panentheism (4)
- Parish life (34)
- pascha (9)
- Pascha/Easter (17)
- Patristics (7)
- perseverance (7)
- phatcatholic (6)
- politics (51)
- Prayer (32)
- prevenient grace (6)
- Protestantism (135)
- quotes (5)
- rapture (2)
- resources (8)
- resurrection of the dead (5)
- RocknRoll (4)
- Roman Catholicism (36)
- Romans 9 (10)
- sacramental theology (6)
- Sacred Music (10)
- scripture (71)
- scripture exposition/Interpretation (95)
- semi-pelagianism (9)
- Septuagint (12)
- Sola Scriptura (5)
- Theological vocabulary (6)
- Theotokos (4)
- thoughts (157)
- Tony Allen (9)
- tradition (35)
- Trinity (9)
- Western Rite (1)
Saint John the Theologian
Facebook Badge
Followers
Total Pageviews
Protestant & Catholic Rapsites I post on
About Me
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
The Grace of Baptism & Later Personal Awareness
It took me awhile to understand Baptismal grace. I was raised Baptist and we were tought that it was a work that we do for God out of Obedience, and that it was nothing more than a symbol of our dying and rising with Christ.
The Prespyterians have a little stronger view, in the sense that they teach that Baptism is a means of grace.
It is unclear at this time, what they mean by that. And their interpretation of that statement may vary in each Prespyterian church....or denomination.
The Anglicans are suppose to believe in Baptismal regeneration, but because of the influence of the Reformed, it may be a bit watered down. I know that some of the highchurch Anglicans have a different interpretation of it then the other groups within Anglicanism.
And when I was Anglo-Catholic I believed that it was something God did for us. Therefore it was grace........not a work.
The Lutherians are supposed to believe in Baptismal regeneration, but some of them seem to be embarrased of the doctrine.
But those that do embrace it, claim that it is something that God does for us. So they see it as Grace.
The Cambellites (The Church of Christ) also embrace a form of Baptismal regeneration, although some of them may reject that term for the doctrine that they believe in. I kind of forgot how they view it, so I won't comment about their view of it.
The Methodhists seem to hold to a form of Baptismal regeneration for infants, but it is still unclear to me how they understand Baptism. Sometimes it seems as if they have been influenced by a Baptist Zwinglian understanding or a Reformed understanding of it, but it is still unclear to me what they mean when they talk about Baptism.
The Orthodox believe that Baptism is grace, the same is true for Rome. Now how this relates to a later personal awareness is this:
The seed found in 1st John
1 John 3:9
No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
The seed planted in us through Baptism & Chrismation may be dorment for a time, but when we make the faith of our parents our own, then the emotional experience that some get when they repent and say a protestant "sinners prayer", or walk up to an alter call (at a protestant gathering)
What they are really experiencing is nothing more than the grace that was already givin at water Baptism & Chrismation. It was just awakened at a later time, or the person was made personally aware of that grace at a later time.
And this is what I believe is happening to alot of people that were Baptized as infants in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
But as they get older, some of them astray and no longer attend the church of their parents. Some may wonder in the World until they find a T.V. or Radio preacher, and so they say the sinners prayer.
Or maybe they have friends that were protestant, so they were invited to a church revival, in where they walked up to the alter call.
And they are told that such an experience is what it means to be born again, when in reality, what they experienced was the grace givin to them at Baptism when they were infants.
They were just made aware of the seed put in them, at a later age.
Well, this is my 2 cents of what's going on. Not only with myself, but with a host of other Americans and now people in the third world countries.
There needs to be a re-teaching in the land/culture that being born again is at water Baptism, for that is when we are united with Christ's death and resurrection. If it is only a mere symbol then that would mean that our Union with the dying and risen Lord is mere symbolic. Which would also mean that salvation itself is mere symbolism.
I hope I didn't offend anyone, but there needs to be both, an embrace of one's infant baptism as well as a personal interier awareness & commitment to follow the Lord for the rest of our days.
JNORM888
The Prespyterians have a little stronger view, in the sense that they teach that Baptism is a means of grace.
It is unclear at this time, what they mean by that. And their interpretation of that statement may vary in each Prespyterian church....or denomination.
The Anglicans are suppose to believe in Baptismal regeneration, but because of the influence of the Reformed, it may be a bit watered down. I know that some of the highchurch Anglicans have a different interpretation of it then the other groups within Anglicanism.
And when I was Anglo-Catholic I believed that it was something God did for us. Therefore it was grace........not a work.
The Lutherians are supposed to believe in Baptismal regeneration, but some of them seem to be embarrased of the doctrine.
But those that do embrace it, claim that it is something that God does for us. So they see it as Grace.
The Cambellites (The Church of Christ) also embrace a form of Baptismal regeneration, although some of them may reject that term for the doctrine that they believe in. I kind of forgot how they view it, so I won't comment about their view of it.
The Methodhists seem to hold to a form of Baptismal regeneration for infants, but it is still unclear to me how they understand Baptism. Sometimes it seems as if they have been influenced by a Baptist Zwinglian understanding or a Reformed understanding of it, but it is still unclear to me what they mean when they talk about Baptism.
The Orthodox believe that Baptism is grace, the same is true for Rome. Now how this relates to a later personal awareness is this:
The seed found in 1st John
1 John 3:9
No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
The seed planted in us through Baptism & Chrismation may be dorment for a time, but when we make the faith of our parents our own, then the emotional experience that some get when they repent and say a protestant "sinners prayer", or walk up to an alter call (at a protestant gathering)
What they are really experiencing is nothing more than the grace that was already givin at water Baptism & Chrismation. It was just awakened at a later time, or the person was made personally aware of that grace at a later time.
And this is what I believe is happening to alot of people that were Baptized as infants in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
But as they get older, some of them astray and no longer attend the church of their parents. Some may wonder in the World until they find a T.V. or Radio preacher, and so they say the sinners prayer.
Or maybe they have friends that were protestant, so they were invited to a church revival, in where they walked up to the alter call.
And they are told that such an experience is what it means to be born again, when in reality, what they experienced was the grace givin to them at Baptism when they were infants.
They were just made aware of the seed put in them, at a later age.
Well, this is my 2 cents of what's going on. Not only with myself, but with a host of other Americans and now people in the third world countries.
There needs to be a re-teaching in the land/culture that being born again is at water Baptism, for that is when we are united with Christ's death and resurrection. If it is only a mere symbol then that would mean that our Union with the dying and risen Lord is mere symbolic. Which would also mean that salvation itself is mere symbolism.
I hope I didn't offend anyone, but there needs to be both, an embrace of one's infant baptism as well as a personal interier awareness & commitment to follow the Lord for the rest of our days.
JNORM888
Labels:
Baptism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blogs: Eastern Orthodox
-
-
-
-
The Four Horsemen of Palamism2 years ago
-
-
-
It’s Time to Say Goodbye2 years ago
-
-
-
Orthodox Life13 years ago
-
-
-
How We Prove Our Love To God5 weeks ago
-
-
-
The end of Pious Fabrications10 years ago
-
The Holy Fathers on Witchcraft11 months ago
-
Bending Toward Bethlehem10 months ago
Blogs: Oriental Orthodox
-
-
The Importance of The Passion Week8 years ago
Blogs: Roman Catholic
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Brief Update10 years ago
-
-
-
My Sister's New Blog13 years ago
-
Blogs: Anglo-Catholic/ACNA
-
25th SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY 20245 days ago
-
Hello world!10 months ago
-
-
-
Blogs: Lutheran Protestant
-
Whew!3 hours ago
-
-
-
Blogs: Mostly Arminian Protestant
-
Book Review: Grace for All9 years ago
-
-
Design Interior Rumah Type 36/726 years ago
-
Christian Rappers and Collaborations13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
When Truth is Partial: Horses Like Apples3 years ago
-
-
-
NOT Independence Sunday15 years ago
-
Picture of Calvinist Ship2 years ago
Blogs: Reformed Protestant
-
-
Do Not Disavow6 months ago
-
-
This Blog Has Moved!!!10 years ago
-
-
John Calvin And The Use Of Icons15 years ago
-
-
0 comments: