Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(383)
-
▼
April
(42)
- Christ is Risen! (response)Truly He is Risen!
- Answering a question about the Ethiopian Canon
- Holy and Great Friday
- answering a question about Tertullian's form of Cr...
- A question about the coming Pascha
- answering a question about a few denominations
- The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts & English Trans...
- Panentheism
- Being made in God's image...then and now
- The Crucifixion of Christ - Part 2
- Joy, Peace, and Thought (Philippians 4)
- Calvinism & Usury
- The Wife of Pilate
- The Crucifixion of Christ - Part 1
- Is Calvinism one step away from Atheism?
- Calvinism's historical inconsistency with Romans 1...
- Happy Palm Sunday!
- Some of the water marks of "free will"
- FREE WILL
- Wise statements by "Gary Michuta"
- The 5th week of great Lent
- Sixth International Conference on Creationism
- The Roman Trial - part 2
- ""Was Arminius a Molinist?" by Eef Dekker's
- Canon debate between Josh & Jay
- Classical Arminianism: Single-Conditional Election
- Arminian Chronicles: Review of the Freedom of the ...
- The Roman Trial - part 1
- Ancient Christianity Conference on HOPE
- Thoughts about the first two verses of Hebrews cha...
- Inspiration & Incarnation by Peter Enns
- Perseverence of the Saints series
- False Alarm: Dangerous Preachers and Authors
- The Holycultureradio blog and podcast
- JOHN CALVIN and HUMANism
- Classical Arminianism: That Whole Supralapsarian P...
- The Roman Catholic system of thought compared to C...
- Today is the 4th Sunday of Lent
- The different kinds of Calvinists I've noticed thr...
- The Jewish Trial - 2
- Early Christian Martyrs
- Theology and the Slave Trade
-
▼
April
(42)
Saint Moses the Black
Ecumenical Councils
Popular Posts
-
A former Calvinist becomes Eastern Orthodox. In the podcast " The Illumined Heart Podcast " Kevin interviews Robert Meyering. From...
-
"(6) He also wrote a dialogue against the Jews, which he held at Ephesus with Tryphon, the most distinguished among the Hebrews of his ...
-
It's in a few weeks, and I gotta make sure I know who is coming with me. So far, I have three people in Pittsburgh who are interested,...
-
This is a link of the Sermons of Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios on the Apocalypse of St. John. Introduction of the Apocalypse part 1 part 2 Fo...
-
I recently took a leave of absence from the St. Stephen's Course in Orthodox Theology program. My finances were short for this semester...
-
Bishop Daniel was a bishop over the Russian Old believers in communion with Russia through ROCOR. Alot of people don't know about the Ol...
Labels
- about me (54)
- African American (33)
- Albert (5)
- ancestral sin (5)
- Ancient Christianity Conference (31)
- ancient heresies (23)
- ancientfaithradio (124)
- Archeology (11)
- Arminianism (32)
- Atheism (26)
- Atonement (18)
- Audio Sermons (10)
- Augustinianism (14)
- Baptism (11)
- Bible study (12)
- Book reviews (7)
- books (69)
- brotherhood of saint moses (25)
- calamity (2)
- Calvinism (69)
- charity (3)
- Christmass (10)
- Christology (1)
- Church Calendar (5)
- church fathers (60)
- church history (120)
- Confession (1)
- conspiracy theories (4)
- conversion stories (42)
- creationism (13)
- David (7)
- debates (14)
- determinism (1)
- Divine Energies/grace (15)
- Divine Energiesgrace (1)
- Divine Liturgy (5)
- Dr. Jeannie Constantinou (43)
- Eastern Orthodoxy (254)
- ecclesiology (3)
- Economics (2)
- Ecumenical councils (8)
- election (6)
- eschatology (22)
- Eucharist (7)
- Eugenics (7)
- Evangelism (1)
- fasting (8)
- free will (27)
- Ft. Thomas Hopko (43)
- fullpreterism (5)
- hiphop music (31)
- Icons (15)
- Incarnation (1)
- interest (3)
- Isa Almisry (1)
- Jesus (18)
- Kabane52 (1)
- Kallistos Ware (8)
- Learning Greek (5)
- Lectures (2)
- Lutheranism (1)
- Maximus Scott (2)
- Monasticism (15)
- Neopaganism (1)
- News (6)
- Oriental Orthodox (16)
- Orthodox Apologetics (22)
- Orthodox education (12)
- Orthodox Podcasts (30)
- Orthodox videos (67)
- Orthros/Matins (1)
- Panentheism (4)
- Parish life (34)
- pascha (9)
- Pascha/Easter (17)
- Patristics (7)
- perseverance (7)
- phatcatholic (6)
- politics (51)
- Prayer (32)
- prevenient grace (6)
- Protestantism (135)
- quotes (5)
- rapture (2)
- resources (8)
- resurrection of the dead (5)
- RocknRoll (4)
- Roman Catholicism (36)
- Romans 9 (10)
- sacramental theology (6)
- Sacred Music (10)
- scripture (71)
- scripture exposition/Interpretation (95)
- semi-pelagianism (9)
- Septuagint (12)
- Sola Scriptura (5)
- Theological vocabulary (6)
- Theotokos (4)
- thoughts (157)
- Tony Allen (9)
- tradition (35)
- Trinity (9)
- Western Rite (1)
Saint John the Theologian
Facebook Badge
Followers
Total Pageviews
Protestant & Catholic Rapsites I post on
About Me
Sunday, April 6, 2008
The Roman Catholic system of thought compared to Calvinism & Arminianism
A commenter from Australia once asked me what school of thought was Rome closer to in regards to Calvinism and Arminianism.
The Truth is Rome is not a monolith. She has many different schools of thought within herself. If I am wrong I'm sure a Roman Catholic will correct me.
But as far as I know she has four different schools of thought.
1.) The Augustinian school of thought:
The Augustinian school of thought has been diminished eversince the Protestants & Jansenists were weeded out of the Roman Communion.
Now she is a minority within the RC schools of thought.
2.) The Thomas Aquinas school of thought or Thomism:
The Thomistic school of thought is the official Roman Catholic system of thought. It is alot closer to Calvinism than Arminianism.......which is odd because Arminius did follow the thinking of Aquinas on alot of issues. Like Calvinism, it believes in irresistible grace, however, it prefers to use the term "Efficacious" grace instead. R.C. sproul....a Calvinist is accused of being Thomistic. I heard that there were some evengelicals that called themselves "Thomistic evangelicals".
3.) The Congruent school of thought:
The congruent school of thought is a hybrid or middle ground between Thomism and Molinism. If one thinks of the mainstream American Protestant hybrid of Arminianism and Calvinism...which is sometimes called "Calminianism.......then it is easier to understand what is going on with the Congruent school of thought. I don't know much else about this school .....so I'm going to move on.
4.) The Molinistic school of thought:
Molina was asked by the Jesuits to teach their Society theology, and thus the theology of the Jesuits became Molinistic.
The Molinistic school of thought is opposed to Thomism in the same way Arminianism is opposed to Calvinism. Molinism is very similar to Arminianism. There is alot of overlap between the two schools of thought. There are some modern evangelicals that embrace Molinism. One of which is "William Lane Craig". Just like Arminianism, Molinism is accused by the Thomists of being semi-pelagian. The Molinists deny this charge and a possible rift or Roman Catholic schizm over this issue was stopped by a Pope. I forgot the Pope's name. But a type of truce was formed to stop the possible split. Molinism tends to be the most popular view in Roman Catholicism.
So I would say that #' 1 & 2 are closer to Calvinism while numbers 3 & 4 are closer to Arminianism. Well....I'm not really sure about # 3. but number 4 is most definately close to Arminianism.
And in the areas of grace. Rome has what is called "Actual grace" and "Sanctifying grace".
I may be wrong, but it seems as if Rome's ussage of "Actual grace" is similar to the way Arminians use the words "Prevenient grace".
And her ussage of the words "Sanctifying grace" is similar to the Arminian ussage of "Saving grace"......except for the nonAnglo-catholic(Anglican) Arminian, most other Arminians would see it as being "sacramentless".....void of sacraments.
I may be wrong, but it seems as if the Calvinist's ussage of saving grace is what Rome would call "Actual grace".....except the Calvinists would see it as "Saving".....so it would have the power of what Rome would call "Sanctifying", but it would be void of the sacraments.
In the Molinistic scheme of things....actual grace is seen as "sufficient" to make the person able to choose. Alot of Calvinists accuse Rome of not believing in "total inability" but she does believe it.
The only difference is she believes that "actual grace" enables a person to have the ability to choose.
So depending on what school of thought the Roman Catholic is in, will decide what "interpretation" or slant you will get from them in the area of "grace and free will".
A Roman Catholic that is a Molinist will sound alot like an Arminian.
While a Roman Catholic that is a Thomist will sound alot like a Calvinist.
a good molinist Roman catholic blog to go too that talks about some of these same issues is:
http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2008/03/catholic-predestination-molinism-and.html
JNORM888
The Truth is Rome is not a monolith. She has many different schools of thought within herself. If I am wrong I'm sure a Roman Catholic will correct me.
But as far as I know she has four different schools of thought.
1.) The Augustinian school of thought:
The Augustinian school of thought has been diminished eversince the Protestants & Jansenists were weeded out of the Roman Communion.
Now she is a minority within the RC schools of thought.
2.) The Thomas Aquinas school of thought or Thomism:
The Thomistic school of thought is the official Roman Catholic system of thought. It is alot closer to Calvinism than Arminianism.......which is odd because Arminius did follow the thinking of Aquinas on alot of issues. Like Calvinism, it believes in irresistible grace, however, it prefers to use the term "Efficacious" grace instead. R.C. sproul....a Calvinist is accused of being Thomistic. I heard that there were some evengelicals that called themselves "Thomistic evangelicals".
3.) The Congruent school of thought:
The congruent school of thought is a hybrid or middle ground between Thomism and Molinism. If one thinks of the mainstream American Protestant hybrid of Arminianism and Calvinism...which is sometimes called "Calminianism.......then it is easier to understand what is going on with the Congruent school of thought. I don't know much else about this school .....so I'm going to move on.
4.) The Molinistic school of thought:
Molina was asked by the Jesuits to teach their Society theology, and thus the theology of the Jesuits became Molinistic.
The Molinistic school of thought is opposed to Thomism in the same way Arminianism is opposed to Calvinism. Molinism is very similar to Arminianism. There is alot of overlap between the two schools of thought. There are some modern evangelicals that embrace Molinism. One of which is "William Lane Craig". Just like Arminianism, Molinism is accused by the Thomists of being semi-pelagian. The Molinists deny this charge and a possible rift or Roman Catholic schizm over this issue was stopped by a Pope. I forgot the Pope's name. But a type of truce was formed to stop the possible split. Molinism tends to be the most popular view in Roman Catholicism.
So I would say that #' 1 & 2 are closer to Calvinism while numbers 3 & 4 are closer to Arminianism. Well....I'm not really sure about # 3. but number 4 is most definately close to Arminianism.
And in the areas of grace. Rome has what is called "Actual grace" and "Sanctifying grace".
I may be wrong, but it seems as if Rome's ussage of "Actual grace" is similar to the way Arminians use the words "Prevenient grace".
And her ussage of the words "Sanctifying grace" is similar to the Arminian ussage of "Saving grace"......except for the nonAnglo-catholic(Anglican) Arminian, most other Arminians would see it as being "sacramentless".....void of sacraments.
I may be wrong, but it seems as if the Calvinist's ussage of saving grace is what Rome would call "Actual grace".....except the Calvinists would see it as "Saving".....so it would have the power of what Rome would call "Sanctifying", but it would be void of the sacraments.
In the Molinistic scheme of things....actual grace is seen as "sufficient" to make the person able to choose. Alot of Calvinists accuse Rome of not believing in "total inability" but she does believe it.
The only difference is she believes that "actual grace" enables a person to have the ability to choose.
So depending on what school of thought the Roman Catholic is in, will decide what "interpretation" or slant you will get from them in the area of "grace and free will".
A Roman Catholic that is a Molinist will sound alot like an Arminian.
While a Roman Catholic that is a Thomist will sound alot like a Calvinist.
a good molinist Roman catholic blog to go too that talks about some of these same issues is:
http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2008/03/catholic-predestination-molinism-and.html
JNORM888
Labels:
Protestantism,
Roman Catholicism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blogs: Eastern Orthodox
-
-
Why Not Use Ancient Rites?4 years ago
-
-
The Four Horsemen of Palamism2 years ago
-
-
-
It’s Time to Say Goodbye2 years ago
-
-
-
Orthodox Life13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
The end of Pious Fabrications10 years ago
-
-
Bending Toward Bethlehem11 months ago
Blogs: Oriental Orthodox
-
Diagnosis and Prescription8 years ago
-
Restoration of The Son8 years ago
Blogs: Roman Catholic
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Brief Update11 years ago
-
-
-
My Sister's New Blog13 years ago
-
Blogs: Anglo-Catholic/ACNA
-
PART 13 GOSPEL OF JOHN8 hours ago
-
Hello world!11 months ago
-
-
-
Blogs: Lutheran Protestant
Blogs: Mostly Arminian Protestant
-
Book Review: Grace for All9 years ago
-
-
Denah Rumah Type 36 Luas Tanah 726 years ago
-
Christian Rappers and Collaborations13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOT Independence Sunday15 years ago
-
Blogs: Reformed Protestant
-
-
Do Not Disavow7 months ago
-
-
This Blog Has Moved!!!10 years ago
-
-
Is Peter the Rock of the Church?14 years ago
-
-
2 comments:
Hi JNORM,
Thought I would comment on Congruism. Here's an exerpt from an article on Molinism about congruism:
The second dispute concerns the reason for the efficaciousness of the grace whereby God cooperates with supernaturally salvific acts of free choice. Suppose that in circumstances C, influenced by grace G, Peter freely elicits salvific act A. All Molinists agree that God places Peter in C with G knowing full well that Peter will freely elicit A; and they also agree that G is not intrinsically efficacious and hence does not causally predetermine A. However, there is strong disagreement about whether or not it is Peter's free consent alone that "extrinsically" renders G efficacious in C with respect to A.
One possible scenario is that God first resolves absolutely that Peter should freely elicit A in C and then, as it were, consults his middle knowledge to see just which particular graces would, if bestowed on Peter in C, obtain his free consent and thus issue in A. It follows that, given his antecedent resolution, God would have conferred some grace other than G if he had known by his middle knowledge that G would turn out to be "merely sufficient" with respect to A, i.e., that Peter would not freely consent to G in C. So G is rendered efficacious not only by Peter's free consent but also, and indeed more principally, by God's antecedent predetermination to confer a "congruous" grace that will guarantee Peter's acting well in C. This model, which brings Molinism more into line with Bañezianism, is known as Congruism and was worked out in detail by Robert Bellarmine and Francisco Suárez. In 1613 Congruism was mandated for all Jesuit theologians by the Father General Claude Aquiviva.
Freddoso on Molinism
The general idea is that God first unconditionally elects individuals then choses to put them in the circumstances and provide them with the grace that He knows, via middle knowledge, that they would accept His grace.
God be with you,
Dan
Thanks,
I guess Molinism is way more deterministic than I thought.
JNORM888