Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(383)
-
▼
April
(42)
- Christ is Risen! (response)Truly He is Risen!
- Answering a question about the Ethiopian Canon
- Holy and Great Friday
- answering a question about Tertullian's form of Cr...
- A question about the coming Pascha
- answering a question about a few denominations
- The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts & English Trans...
- Panentheism
- Being made in God's image...then and now
- The Crucifixion of Christ - Part 2
- Joy, Peace, and Thought (Philippians 4)
- Calvinism & Usury
- The Wife of Pilate
- The Crucifixion of Christ - Part 1
- Is Calvinism one step away from Atheism?
- Calvinism's historical inconsistency with Romans 1...
- Happy Palm Sunday!
- Some of the water marks of "free will"
- FREE WILL
- Wise statements by "Gary Michuta"
- The 5th week of great Lent
- Sixth International Conference on Creationism
- The Roman Trial - part 2
- ""Was Arminius a Molinist?" by Eef Dekker's
- Canon debate between Josh & Jay
- Classical Arminianism: Single-Conditional Election
- Arminian Chronicles: Review of the Freedom of the ...
- The Roman Trial - part 1
- Ancient Christianity Conference on HOPE
- Thoughts about the first two verses of Hebrews cha...
- Inspiration & Incarnation by Peter Enns
- Perseverence of the Saints series
- False Alarm: Dangerous Preachers and Authors
- The Holycultureradio blog and podcast
- JOHN CALVIN and HUMANism
- Classical Arminianism: That Whole Supralapsarian P...
- The Roman Catholic system of thought compared to C...
- Today is the 4th Sunday of Lent
- The different kinds of Calvinists I've noticed thr...
- The Jewish Trial - 2
- Early Christian Martyrs
- Theology and the Slave Trade
-
▼
April
(42)
Saint Moses the Black
Ecumenical Councils
Popular Posts
-
He begins with what happened in Alaska in 1795. http://audio.ancientfaith.com/specials/svs/eduday_frchad.mp3 JNORM888
-
By Alexander F. C. Webster, & Darrell Cole As seen from the website : This gives the opposite view of the other book "The Pacifist ...
-
Orthodox.tv has alot of videos about various Saints on their website. You can buy them at their Store , or you can view them online by subs...
-
This is lesson 18 of the introduction to the Bible series by Dr. Jeannie Constantinou, from her podcast " Search the Scriptures "....
-
"Aquila, a Jewish proselyte who lived in the early second century, made a Greek translation of the Old Testament. Thereafter, the Jews ...
-
Part 1: Part 2: Part 3: JNORM888
Labels
- about me (54)
- African American (33)
- Albert (5)
- ancestral sin (5)
- Ancient Christianity Conference (31)
- ancient heresies (23)
- ancientfaithradio (124)
- Archeology (11)
- Arminianism (32)
- Atheism (26)
- Atonement (18)
- Audio Sermons (10)
- Augustinianism (14)
- Baptism (11)
- Bible study (12)
- Book reviews (7)
- books (69)
- brotherhood of saint moses (25)
- calamity (2)
- Calvinism (69)
- charity (3)
- Christmass (10)
- Christology (1)
- Church Calendar (5)
- church fathers (60)
- church history (120)
- Confession (1)
- conspiracy theories (4)
- conversion stories (42)
- creationism (13)
- David (7)
- debates (14)
- determinism (1)
- Divine Energies/grace (15)
- Divine Energiesgrace (1)
- Divine Liturgy (5)
- Dr. Jeannie Constantinou (43)
- Eastern Orthodoxy (254)
- ecclesiology (3)
- Economics (2)
- Ecumenical councils (8)
- election (6)
- eschatology (22)
- Eucharist (7)
- Eugenics (7)
- Evangelism (1)
- fasting (8)
- free will (27)
- Ft. Thomas Hopko (43)
- fullpreterism (5)
- hiphop music (31)
- Icons (15)
- Incarnation (1)
- interest (3)
- Isa Almisry (1)
- Jesus (18)
- Kabane52 (1)
- Kallistos Ware (8)
- Learning Greek (5)
- Lectures (2)
- Lutheranism (1)
- Maximus Scott (2)
- Monasticism (15)
- Neopaganism (1)
- News (6)
- Oriental Orthodox (16)
- Orthodox Apologetics (22)
- Orthodox education (12)
- Orthodox Podcasts (30)
- Orthodox videos (67)
- Orthros/Matins (1)
- Panentheism (4)
- Parish life (34)
- pascha (9)
- Pascha/Easter (17)
- Patristics (7)
- perseverance (7)
- phatcatholic (6)
- politics (51)
- Prayer (32)
- prevenient grace (6)
- Protestantism (135)
- quotes (5)
- rapture (2)
- resources (8)
- resurrection of the dead (5)
- RocknRoll (4)
- Roman Catholicism (36)
- Romans 9 (10)
- sacramental theology (6)
- Sacred Music (10)
- scripture (71)
- scripture exposition/Interpretation (95)
- semi-pelagianism (9)
- Septuagint (12)
- Sola Scriptura (5)
- Theological vocabulary (6)
- Theotokos (4)
- thoughts (157)
- Tony Allen (9)
- tradition (35)
- Trinity (9)
- Western Rite (1)
Saint John the Theologian
Facebook Badge
Followers
Total Pageviews
Protestant & Catholic Rapsites I post on
About Me
Saturday, April 5, 2008
The different kinds of Calvinists I've noticed throughout the years
I'm just gonna mention the different kinds of Calvinists I ran into over the years. Or read about.
I might be wrong about some of this, so please correct me if I am.
1.) Infralapsarianism vs Supralapsarianism
2.) Single Predestination vs double Predestination
3.) Common grace vs noncommon grace
4.) Credo-Baptism vs Paedo- Baptism
5.) Credo-communion vs Paedo-communion
6.) Monergism only in regards to Justification & Synergism in regards to Sanctification
vs
Monergism in regards to both Justification & Sanctification
7.) Sola Scriptura(Scripture, creeds, and church, but scripture is supreme authority) according to a full pret Calvinistic friend of mine (kingneb/Jason) who has beef with "Keith Mathison" & "Kenneth Gentry" for holding this view
This is his podcast about the topic of sola scriptura.....mainly within the reformed tradition
http://www.sermonplayer.com/podcastredirect/index.mp3?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sermonplayer.com%
vs
Solo Scriptura(creeds & church are mostly ignored or downplayed.....very similar to the "church of christ" stance) My calvinistic full pret buddy (who is extremely hard to beat in debates. He is one of the tuffest dudes I have ever argued with....the man can hold his own ground) holds to this view of Solo Scriptura.
8.) Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all have asiety vs unknown.......I forgot, but there was a dispute in some Reformed circles about the creed of Nicea. One group within the Reformed camp wanted to get rid of the creed because it's signers were Subordinate Triniterians.
9.) Partial Preterism vs Full Preterism vs Futurism
10.) Compatibilism vs Hard determinism
11.) 5 pointers vs 4 pointers
12.) P.O.T.S. vs A.S.A.S.
13.) NPP & Federal vision vs Traditionalists
14.) Van Tillian vs Gordan Clark
15.) Dominion Theology/THEONOMY vs ....uhm I forgot
There maybe more, but these were the things I noticed. And depending where the Calvinist stands on these issues will decide what interpretation of scripture they will have.
So the argument that will work against one calvinist may not necessarily work against another Calvinist.
Some of these things are not really calvinistic.....like Paedo/Credo Communion & Baptism, Theonomy, and Full Preterism, but others are. Over the years I came to the conclusion that every belief will have an influence on another belief......and this is why there are no "one size fits all" arguments. In many cases every argument must be "tailor made".....and that takes time.
I only mentioned KingNeb's podcast because I assumed that some would think I was crazy for thinking that the reformed camp had different views of sola scriptura. I heavily disagree with KingNeb on alot of issues, but after arguing with him for a number of years......I must say that I learned alot from him........especially when it comes to the heresy of "full preterism" & the other different views of the Reformed tradition.
Also....one thing about Luther and creeds. He thought that the Church went off track in the 12th century. And the creeds he was mainly talking about were those after the 12th century......for the most part. He wasn't talking about "all the creeds". This is something not mentioned in their podcast......but "full prets" must ignore creeds anyway......but that's another story for another time.
But to make the long story short KingNeb and them see Deductive Logic as being the boundaries of scripture interpretation. So as they pick on Mathison and Gentry for holding to a higher view of creeds and church when it comes to "scripture interpretation". They themselves hold to a high view of Aristotlian deductive logic when it comes to "scripture interpretation". They are not saying this....but after a few arguments with KingNeb I found this out.
If you are not familiar with Full preterism then I will advise the public to stay far away from full preterism websites. Most of them are Calvinists, but you do have some that are "church of christ". The reason why I say stay away is because they are heavy on "logic" so it is easy for them to twist certain scriptures by stressing an ultra literalism in certain places. Also there is a tendency for full prets to eventually drift away from any form of christianity. It is hard for many of them to find a good place to fellowship....due to the fact of their "full" preterism.
I don't know the exact number of "full preterists", but it's about less than 100,000 ...maybe even 50,000.
JNORM888
I might be wrong about some of this, so please correct me if I am.
1.) Infralapsarianism vs Supralapsarianism
2.) Single Predestination vs double Predestination
3.) Common grace vs noncommon grace
4.) Credo-Baptism vs Paedo- Baptism
5.) Credo-communion vs Paedo-communion
6.) Monergism only in regards to Justification & Synergism in regards to Sanctification
vs
Monergism in regards to both Justification & Sanctification
7.) Sola Scriptura(Scripture, creeds, and church, but scripture is supreme authority) according to a full pret Calvinistic friend of mine (kingneb/Jason) who has beef with "Keith Mathison" & "Kenneth Gentry" for holding this view
This is his podcast about the topic of sola scriptura.....mainly within the reformed tradition
http://www.sermonplayer.com/podcastredirect/index.mp3?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sermonplayer.com%
vs
Solo Scriptura(creeds & church are mostly ignored or downplayed.....very similar to the "church of christ" stance) My calvinistic full pret buddy (who is extremely hard to beat in debates. He is one of the tuffest dudes I have ever argued with....the man can hold his own ground) holds to this view of Solo Scriptura.
8.) Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all have asiety vs unknown.......I forgot, but there was a dispute in some Reformed circles about the creed of Nicea. One group within the Reformed camp wanted to get rid of the creed because it's signers were Subordinate Triniterians.
9.) Partial Preterism vs Full Preterism vs Futurism
10.) Compatibilism vs Hard determinism
11.) 5 pointers vs 4 pointers
12.) P.O.T.S. vs A.S.A.S.
13.) NPP & Federal vision vs Traditionalists
14.) Van Tillian vs Gordan Clark
15.) Dominion Theology/THEONOMY vs ....uhm I forgot
There maybe more, but these were the things I noticed. And depending where the Calvinist stands on these issues will decide what interpretation of scripture they will have.
So the argument that will work against one calvinist may not necessarily work against another Calvinist.
Some of these things are not really calvinistic.....like Paedo/Credo Communion & Baptism, Theonomy, and Full Preterism, but others are. Over the years I came to the conclusion that every belief will have an influence on another belief......and this is why there are no "one size fits all" arguments. In many cases every argument must be "tailor made".....and that takes time.
I only mentioned KingNeb's podcast because I assumed that some would think I was crazy for thinking that the reformed camp had different views of sola scriptura. I heavily disagree with KingNeb on alot of issues, but after arguing with him for a number of years......I must say that I learned alot from him........especially when it comes to the heresy of "full preterism" & the other different views of the Reformed tradition.
Also....one thing about Luther and creeds. He thought that the Church went off track in the 12th century. And the creeds he was mainly talking about were those after the 12th century......for the most part. He wasn't talking about "all the creeds". This is something not mentioned in their podcast......but "full prets" must ignore creeds anyway......but that's another story for another time.
But to make the long story short KingNeb and them see Deductive Logic as being the boundaries of scripture interpretation. So as they pick on Mathison and Gentry for holding to a higher view of creeds and church when it comes to "scripture interpretation". They themselves hold to a high view of Aristotlian deductive logic when it comes to "scripture interpretation". They are not saying this....but after a few arguments with KingNeb I found this out.
If you are not familiar with Full preterism then I will advise the public to stay far away from full preterism websites. Most of them are Calvinists, but you do have some that are "church of christ". The reason why I say stay away is because they are heavy on "logic" so it is easy for them to twist certain scriptures by stressing an ultra literalism in certain places. Also there is a tendency for full prets to eventually drift away from any form of christianity. It is hard for many of them to find a good place to fellowship....due to the fact of their "full" preterism.
I don't know the exact number of "full preterists", but it's about less than 100,000 ...maybe even 50,000.
JNORM888
Labels:
Calvinism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blogs: Eastern Orthodox
-
-
-
-
The Four Horsemen of Palamism2 years ago
-
-
-
It’s Time to Say Goodbye2 years ago
-
-
-
Orthodox Life13 years ago
-
-
-
How We Prove Our Love To God5 weeks ago
-
-
-
The end of Pious Fabrications10 years ago
-
The Holy Fathers on Witchcraft11 months ago
-
Bending Toward Bethlehem10 months ago
Blogs: Oriental Orthodox
-
-
The Importance of The Passion Week8 years ago
Blogs: Roman Catholic
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Brief Update10 years ago
-
-
-
My Sister's New Blog13 years ago
-
Blogs: Anglo-Catholic/ACNA
-
25th SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY 20245 days ago
-
Hello world!10 months ago
-
-
-
Blogs: Lutheran Protestant
-
Whew!3 hours ago
-
-
-
Blogs: Mostly Arminian Protestant
-
Book Review: Grace for All9 years ago
-
-
Design Interior Rumah Type 36/726 years ago
-
Christian Rappers and Collaborations13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
When Truth is Partial: Horses Like Apples3 years ago
-
-
-
NOT Independence Sunday15 years ago
-
Picture of Calvinist Ship2 years ago
Blogs: Reformed Protestant
-
-
Do Not Disavow6 months ago
-
-
This Blog Has Moved!!!10 years ago
-
-
John Calvin And The Use Of Icons15 years ago
-
-
3 comments:
Good grief!
I'd have to look at least half of them up in the dictionary, and even then I oprobably wouldn't understand the issues.
But then no doubt your average Calvinist who can interrogate you tin find out where you stand on the TULIP scale woudl probably have to look up hesychasm just as I would have to look up preterism.
yeah, I learned about Full preterism through a calvinistic friend of mine who use to go to a PCA church in Montgomery Alabama. I almost joined that same church back in 2001/2002. But I never really knew the name of it then....some years later I ran into King Neb. And that's when I found out what the name was.
After argueing with him as well as seeing him argue with other calvinists I learned what some of these other issues were.
Also I learned alot through a handfull of other calvinists as well.
I learned alot through watching and arguing with BlackCalvinist talk about some of these issues. I learned through watching Cdero who is a Theonomist and Vantillian Presuppositional Apologist....as well as a host of others.
JNORM888